Best practices for QA testing

Spread the love
Close-up of a laptop and tablet on a wooden desk, showcasing modern technology.

A good startup is mostly dependent on quality software, hence its absence can cause enormous financial losses. Poor-quality software alone costs businesses in the US alone an amazing $2.8 trillion in 2018. Unbelievably, many businesses put growth over excellence, sometimes ignoring the significant influence of software bugs. For example, more than a third of smartphone users delete an app they find to have flaws.

In software development, the argument between adding new and enhancing current functionality usually points to the latter. Still, this division has to be changed. Choosing short-term gains by sacrificing software quality results in major losses down road. Release new features fast to satisfy consumer needs and increase market share, and it can be enticing.

But this strategy can cause technological debt and flaws that will finally show themselves. As technical debt slows down development, sacrificing quality can lead to more expenses, reduced user acceptance, and delayed product delivery. Therefore, ensuring continuous success in your everyday work depends on adhering to optimal standards for QA testing.

Define QA testing.


Before a software product or service launched to consumers, developers follow QA testing to guarantee and validate its quality. Unlike product development, QA testing evaluates attained results and the quality of the last product.

Common QA testing activities include:

  • Finding and fixing mistakes, flaws, and repetitions
  • Verifying logical flow
  • guaranteeing a flawless user experience (UX) and user interface (UI)
  • Fixing unanticipated software defects and
  • Verifying developers follow consumer specifications.
  • Finding whether a product meets consumer needs is the main aim of QA testing; the secondary aim is to guarantee developers solve any problems before release.

Seeking to satisfy industry-best quality standards, QA testing has as its larger goal improving the quality and efficiency of the software development process. Although QA testers have always been active close to the conclusion of the development cycle, contemporary methods promote team cooperation with software developers all through the process, guaranteeing continuous proposals and implementations of best solutions. The dedication to provide consumers with the best product drives a QA tester or analyst.

Of a QA procedure, what is a common example?


Evaluation of whether a product satisfies certain criteria depends on the QA procedure. While different businesses use different software testing methods, the basic phases always remain the same.

Examining project requirements closely by QA analysts helps to clarify early in the development process their involvement parameters. This is absolutely essential and lays the foundation for good quality control.
Once project criteria known, QA experts start the test planning stage. Specifying the necessary testing types and tools, they define the extent of work, create a project-specific testing strategy, and describe the QA methodology for every stage of a software engineering cycle.

Development of test cases:

Test cases are actions done on a system to confirm its proper operation. These scenarios guarantee that features of software follow standards. Creating step-by-step procedures for every testing sequence—including both human and automated testing approaches—is the essence of developing test cases.


Executing ready test cases, evaluating the differences between expected and actual results, and recording flaws, faults, and problems define this stage. To handle these issues, QA testers could design sub-tests and provide team members final results for additional action.
Verification comes from retesting the product once found problems have been resolved. This guarantees best product functionality by means of regression testing and analysis to verify the successful resolution of found faults and to spot any new ones.


Reporting and documentation: The last step is compiling a paper outlining all carried out tests, results, and observations on found mistakes and abnormalities. Acting as a reference for next cycles of product testing, this extensive record of the whole testing process recounts.
Documentation and reporting: The last step is compiling a paper outlining all carried out tests, results, and analysis of found flaws and abnormalities. < Acting as a reference for next cycles of product testing, this extensive record of the whole testing process recounts.

Getting started with QA testing


Many problems in an application could cause user annoyance, lower customer satisfaction, and maybe negative effects on your market position. Therefore, cooperation between developers and QA engineers becomes absolutely vital to stop flaws from leaking into manufacturing.

Maintaining pure standards all through the app testing process is essential for the development and delivery of excellent applications.

As user base grows, exercising more careful in QA becomes even more crucial.

Use the guidelines below to create a strong QA system for testing your software:

  • Including QA testing into every stage of the software development life is crucial. Early participation of QA teams raises the possibility of spotting problems and applying corrective action.
  • Apply the DevOps paradigm, a mix of operations and development teams meant to hasten application development and deployment. Starting from conventional methods, a DevOps approach has major competitive benefits since it lowers failure rates and improves time-to—-market.
  • In QA testing, clarity is essential if quick findings within strict deadlines are to be obtained. Effective delivery of a software product depends on testers accurately understanding its eventual outputs. Moreover, openness lets other teams track and analyze the testing process.
  • Turn on results-oriented QA testing to send QA teams toward the particular corporate objectives of a software product. This approach is mostly focused on building a speedier and more dynamic testing environment so that testers may properly allocate resources and produce best results.

Which tests ought you automate?


Any test needing repeated execution should be automated. Practical and dependable, automated testing will help you make sure the software runs technically satisfactorily.

Still, not every testing necessity will be suited for automation. Crowdtesting lets you augment internal manual testing. This method allows you to be time-efficient and test your goods on a far greater extent.

Integrate agile techniques


Another worthwhile QA habit you should think about is using a technique that combines testing into a set of short development cycles. Agile approaches fit very nicely with the evolution of mobile apps, where customers expect great functionality, quality, and frequent updates and short development cycles are usual.

    Under agile approaches, QA testing is not a separate phase but rather is subtly incorporated into the design and development cycles. Direct integration of test results into the continuous design and development processes guarantees quality as a basic guiding concept.

    How is it working?


    This cooperative strategy calls for designers, developers, the QA team, and occasionally even users to interact or coordinate. Your teams will go through a brief design or development cycle then a focused quality control and testing phase for the recently added new feature.

    The agile method offers what advantage?


    Once you start this path, using automation will keep things flowing. Automated tests accelerate the steps of targeted testing. It guides you into the next development cycle in either hours or days.

    After several necessary design or development cycles, you will have to plan manual tests to include comments on the user experience and other crucial factors. You will then have to set up a structure for looking at and applying the produced data from the brief testing stages.

    Functional testing is insufficient, though; early on feedback should be included into the design and development process.